Send Help (R: 2026)

Sam Raimi Turns Workplace Payback Into Bloody Island Survival

What would you do if the one person you can’t stand is also the only person left alive with you?

That’s the nasty little hook behind Send Help (2026), Sam Raimi’s R-rated survival horror thriller that keeps tightening the screws until the beach feels like a courtroom, a cage, and a punchline all at once. The setup is simple: two coworkers survive a plane crash and wash up on a deserted island, but the movie quickly proves it’s not really about coconuts and campfires. It’s about control, resentment, and what happens when “professional” manners burn off in the sun.

This review stays spoiler-light, focusing on tone, pacing, and whether the movie’s turn of the tables ride is actually worth your ticket. I’ll also land on a final 4.5-star rating.

Quick take: What kind of movie is Send Help, and does it deliver?

Send Help is a survival thriller first, a horror movie second, and a dark comedy whenever Raimi wants you to laugh at the worst possible moment. It runs 1h 53m, and it doesn’t waste much of it. The island is bright, sweaty, and cruel, the tension is constant, and the jokes land like nervous hiccups between bursts of panic.

The R rating isn’t decorative. Expect graphic violence, splashes of gore, and scenes that push past “ow” into “don’t look at that.” It’s not wall-to-wall blood, but when the movie goes there, it commits. If you’re gore-sensitive, that matters.

What surprised me most is how personal it feels. This isn’t a big ensemble disaster film where characters are chess pieces. It’s two people trapped together, forced into teamwork, then yanked back into rivalry. The movie keeps asking the same question in different ways: when survival is the job, who gets to be the boss?

If you like Raimi when he’s mischievous and mean, you’ll probably have a great time. If you want grounded, realistic survival detail, you might bounce off the film’s heightened style. For a broader snapshot of the film’s setup and credits, the listing on IMDb’s Send Help page is a handy reference.

The vibe in one sentence (and what movies it might remind you of)

Imagine a pressure cooker sealed with sunburn and old grudges, then shaken hard until it whistles.

Raimi brings that familiar snap, the uneasy rhythm where suspense builds, something gross happens, then the movie winks at you for reacting. The “two people, one island” setup keeps it intimate, almost like a stage play with sand in its teeth, but it still has that Raimi bounce, the sudden lunges, the sharp reversals, the chaos that feels a little gleeful.

If you’ve enjoyed survival stories where basic needs become war (water, shelter, injury), or workplace dramas where resentment simmers until it boils over, Send Help sits right at that crossroads. It also scratches the itch of twisted comeuppance tales, the kind where you’re not sure who you should root for, but you can’t stop watching the fight.

Who should watch it, and who should skip it

Send Help is a good fit for:

  • Twisty thriller fans who like guessing who’s ahead in the power game
  • Survival movie lovers who enjoy constant problem-solving and rising stakes
  • Dark-humor viewers who don’t mind laughing, then feeling bad about it
  • Payback story watchers who enjoy an “employee vs boss” revenge angle

You may want to skip it if you’re:

  • Gore-sensitive, because the movie has graphic injury and violence
  • Looking for realistic survival accuracy, it favors momentum over manuals
  • Turned off by mean humor and characters who make ugly choices

Story and pacing review: plane crash, island survival, then the tables turn

The premise is clean: Linda and Bradley, coworkers with a messy history, survive a plane crash and end up stranded on a remote island (the film frames it as the Gulf of Thailand). From there, the movie does what strong survival thrillers do best, it makes tiny problems feel enormous. A cut isn’t just a cut, it’s infection. A power move isn’t just rude, it’s life or death.

Pacing is one of the film’s biggest strengths. It doesn’t stall in the “we’re stranded” phase for long. You get the essentials, the hunt for water, shelter, and a plan, then the story starts twisting. It’s twist-heavy, and it wants you to feel off-balance. One minute you think you know the dynamic, the next minute someone changes tactics, re-writes the rules, or reveals a new layer of spite.

The best part is how the movie uses survival as a weapon. Skills become leverage, injuries become bargaining chips, and kindness starts to look like a trap. The island isn’t just a setting, it’s a stripped-down workplace, no HR, no witnesses, no exit interview.

If you’re curious how critics are framing the film’s structure and tone without getting spoiled, The Hollywood Reporter’s review captures that “rivetingly bonkers” energy pretty well.

The boss vs employee power struggle is the real engine of the plot

Yes, the plane crash matters. Yes, the survival problems matter. But the real fuel is the power struggle between a boss who’s used to being obeyed and an employee who’s tired of swallowing it.

Send Help treats humiliation like a wound that never clots. Old workplace slights, credit stolen, opportunities blocked, disrespect disguised as “feedback,” they keep echoing, even when both characters should be focused on staying alive. The island forces honesty, and honesty gets ugly fast.

What makes it work is the cause-and-effect logic. When one person grabs control, the other person reacts. When someone lies, the lie has to be carried through the next crisis. When resentment takes the wheel, it doesn’t steer toward safety; it steers toward obsession. That’s where the movie’s twisted stalking vibe creeps in, not as a side plot, but as a mindset. Watching someone. Testing someone. Cornering someone. On an island, that behavior has nowhere to hide.

Are the twists earned or just shock value?

Mostly earned, with a few “Raimi’s having fun now” spikes.

The better turns come out of character choices, not random lightning bolts. You can trace them back to pride, fear, and the need to win. Even when a twist is big, it usually connects to something small that came earlier, a behavior pattern, a cruel joke, a moment of selfishness.

That said, the movie definitely likes surprises for their own sake, and that’s where some viewers might tap out. If you prefer a steady, realistic survival arc, the wilder swings may feel like shock value. For me, the balancing act works because Raimi uses absurd moments as a pressure valve. You laugh, then you realize you’re laughing in a story that’s circling stalking, obsession, and murder.

For up-to-date audience and critic scores, Rotten Tomatoes’ Send Help page is the simplest snapshot, especially right now, while the conversation is still hot.

Performances and direction: why Raimi’s style makes this one hit hard

Rachel McAdams (Linda Liddle) and Dylan O’Brien (Bradley Preston) carry almost the entire film, and that kind of two-hander only works if the actors can keep changing the temperature. They do. Their rivalry has bite, but it also has rhythm, like a tennis match where the ball is a jagged rock.

Raimi’s direction keeps the island from feeling small. He uses the space like it’s haunted, even in daylight. The camera gets playful when it should, cruel when it must, and impatient in a way that fits the story. This is not a gentle movie. It wants you on edge, then it wants you to realize you’ve been holding your breath.

He’s also great at physical timing. Not “slapstick” exactly, but the body-horror cousin of slapstick, where a stumble can become a nightmare, and a small gag can turn into a wince. The sound work helps too, the crunch, the hiss, the sudden quiet that makes you lean in, then regret leaning in.

If you want another take on how Raimi blends dark laughs with brutality, Variety’s review of Send Help frames it as a twisted survival ride built around McAdams’ presence.

Rachel McAdams and Dylan O’Brien make the rivalry believable (even when it gets extreme)

McAdams plays Linda with a steady gaze that turns sharp when it needs to. You can see her thinking, measuring, planning, and then choosing violence or mercy like she’s picking tools from a kit. She’s not written as a perfect victim, which is part of the fun. She’s capable, stubborn, and sometimes frightening.

O’Brien gives Bradley the kind of charm that feels useful until it turns greasy. He understands how bosses weaponize language, how they talk like they’re being reasonable while they’re tightening a leash. Even when Bradley panics, he tries to stay on top, and that makes him dangerous.

Their chemistry isn’t romantic in a cute way. It’s a battle of wills. The movie keeps nudging you to pick a side, then it makes you question your choice.

Sound, gore, and dark comedy: what to expect from the R rating

Send Help’s gore isn’t constant, but it’s memorable. Expect blood, injury detail, and violent moments that land hard. There are also disturbing images tied to fear and stress, including nightmare-like beats. The film doesn’t linger just to punish you, but it also doesn’t cut away to be polite.

The comedy is pitch-black. It’s the kind that pops up when characters say the wrong thing at the worst time, or when the universe seems to mock them. Sometimes you’ll laugh because it’s funny, other times you’ll laugh because you’re trapped in the tension and your brain wants an exit.

If you’re watching with friends, it’s the sort of movie where someone will say, “That’s messed up,” and everyone will agree, while still watching through their fingers.

My rating, best moments, and the biggest reasons it may be controversial

Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars.

Send Help earns that score because it knows what it is, and it commits. It’s an edge-of-your-seat adventure and survival story, but the real hook is the ugly little power war inside it. The film keeps flipping who’s in charge, who’s lying, who’s stalking the other’s weaknesses, and who’s one bad decision away from murder. That “getting even with the boss” angle isn’t a footnote; it’s the motor.

It also helps that the early reception matches the experience. As of late January 2026, Rotten Tomatoes lists 94% critics and 88% audience, which lines up with the general buzz: people are having fun, even when they’re squirming.

For a quick read on first reactions and the general critic mood, Rotten Tomatoes’ roundup, Send Help First Reviews, gives a spoiler-light sense of why Raimi fans are cheering.

What worked best: tension, payback, and nonstop survival pressure

  • Tight pacing: It keeps moving, even when it’s just two people arguing over the next step.
  • A satisfying turn of the tables: The power shifts feel nasty, personal, and earned.
  • Performances that sell the madness: McAdams and O’Brien stay believable as the story gets extreme.
  • Survival stakes that stay concrete: Water, shelter, injury, and exhaustion never stop mattering.
  • Raimi’s dark comedic timing: The laughs don’t soften the horror, they sharpen it.

What might bother viewers: brutality, character choices, and mean humor

This is where the controversy talk starts, and it’s fair. Send Help can feel vicious. The violence is blunt. The moral lines get smeared. The movie also plays with audience sympathy in a way that can feel manipulative; it dares you to cheer, then shows you what you’re cheering for.

Some viewers will also bounce off the workplace angle, especially when the film touches on sexism and power abuse. It’s not subtle, and it’s not trying to be. Add the themes of obsession and twisted stalking behavior, plus the fact that the story flirts with murder as an option, and you’ve got a movie that’s going to split the crowd.

If you like your survival stories hopeful, this isn’t that. This is survival as a grudge match.

Conclusion

Send Help is a tense, darkly funny survival thriller that keeps tightening its grip until you’re either cackling or wincing, sometimes both. Sam Raimi turns a simple crash-and-strand setup into a nasty little power play about control, revenge, and what people do when the mask slips. With strong performances from Rachel McAdams and Dylan O’Brien, it earns a confident 4.5 stars from me. If you’re in the mood for twists, controversy, and a brutal turn of the tables, it’s a great night at the movies. Share your rating, your favorite twist (spoiler-free), and whether you were on Linda’s side.